Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass came under heavy attack Wednesday night as challenger Spencer Pratt and Councilmember Nithya Raman turned a mayoral debate into a full-blown showdown over wildfires, crime and homelessness.
The debate centered on whether Bass deserves another term running Los Angeles, with the January 2025 Palisades fires quickly becoming the defining flashpoint of the night.
Bass defended her record, arguing the city was already in crisis when she took office and pointed to a reported 17.5% drop in street homelessness along with expanded housing efforts.
She also said her administration deployed enough fire trucks during the wildfire response but blamed staffing shortfalls on former Fire Chief Kristin Crowley, who she said was removed in February 2025.
Pratt went straight for the city’s wildfire preparedness, accusing officials of failing basic safety planning.
He said Fire Chief Kristin Crowley had requested $17 million in funding that was denied and blasted how reservoirs were managed during the fires.
He focused heavily on the Santa Ynez Reservoir being empty during the blaze and promised sweeping changes if elected.
“As mayor, I will never drain the reservoirs that we need for wildfire protection,” Pratt said, adding he would create 20 additional dip sites across Los Angeles.
Bass pushed back on claims about fire conditions and rejected Pratt’s criticism of how the crisis unfolded.
Raman said her experience representing her district had prepared her for extreme weather emergencies and citywide crises.
Public safety quickly became another major battleground.
Bass highlighted a drug enforcement operation tied to MacArthur Park, Calabasas and San Gabriel, saying authorities made 18 arrests and seized 40 pounds of fentanyl in raids carried out Wednesday.
She also said she is pushing to hire more police officers but blamed the county council for delays.
Raman’s past vote against police funding resurfaced during the exchange, while Pratt leaned into a tough-on-crime message, saying many residents feel unsafe and want stronger enforcement.
A controversial needle distribution program also came under fire, including opposition from Langer’s Delicatessen.
Bass said she would end the program. Pratt agreed it should be shut down permanently. Raman opposed that approach, arguing for more investment in housing and services.
“We need to invest in shelter, we need to invest in services,” Raman said.
With the 2028 Olympics approaching, the candidates also clashed over policing levels.
Pratt promised increased hiring of officers.
Bass also said the city needs more police presence.
Raman took a different approach, saying she would maintain current staffing while reducing strain on officers and limiting armed responses to situations that truly require them, stressing that the right responders must show up when residents call 911.
Homelessness remained one of the night’s central issues.
All three candidates agreed that when shelter beds are available, unhoused people should be required to move indoors.
On encampments near schools and daycares, Pratt said they should not be allowed. Raman did not directly answer the question, but pointed to progress in her district, saying encampments had fallen 54% over the past three years.
At one point, Raman suggested Bass and Pratt were politically aligned to avoid competing against her.
Pratt fired back sharply.
“If I wanted to run against anybody, it would be the councilmember who is terrible,” he said.
Read the full article here